Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practice of Sonographers around Infection Prevention and Control in Ultrasound.

Dr Dania Abu Awwad1, Ms Katya Amadita1, Ms Sheri Anne Rae3, Prof Sarah Lewis2, Professor Peter Kench1, Ms Suzanne Hill1, Dr Yobelli Jimenez1

1The University Of Sydney, Australia, 2Western Sydney University, Australia, 3 I-MED Radiology Network, Sydney, Australia

Biography:

Dr Yobelli Jimenez is a qualified radiation therapist and is currently a Senior Lecturer in the Discipline of Medical Imaging Science at the University of Sydney. Dr Jimenez has a strong interest in health profession education research, work integrated learning and infection prevention and control in medical radiation sciences.

Abstract:

Introduction

Infection Prevention and Control (IPC) in medical imaging is multifaceted and diverse challenges exist across different imaging modalities. In ultrasound, infection control risks are unique due to the sonographers' close contact with patients, reusable equipment components, and extended appointment times. As such, adherence to appropriate IPC practices is important to protect both patients and staff. Hence, the aim of this study was to explore sonographers’ knowledge, attitudes and practice (KAP) to IPC.

Methods

A cross-sectional online survey was distributed to Australian sonographers. Section 1 of the survey focused on demographics and workplace factors. Section 2 consisted of Knowledge questions (correct/incorrect responses), and Attitudes and Practice questions (5-point Likert scale).

Results

Overall, 146 and 109 sonographers completed section 1 and 2 respectively. In section 1, 92% of participants expressed that IPC is emphasised in their department, with almost all participants having easy access to hand hygiene products. In section 2, sonographers reported being responsible of setting up invasive procedures (55%) and cleaning (64%), but only 67% reported cleaning equipment used in procedures between patients. Mean average knowledge score were high (95%), while 87% agreed/strongly agreed with favourable attitude statements. Practice compliance varied, with 60-80% indicating they ‘always’ performed recommended behaviours procedures, but most remaining responses indicated frequent or occasional practice.

Conclusion

While knowledge and attitude scores were high for sonographers, frequency of IPC practices were lower. Results from this study suggest opportunities for further exploration on challenges experienced to enact best practice.

 

 

Categories